tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621493109456933437.post54972110337332139..comments2010-07-23T07:04:55.340-07:00David Boardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06200260948279778582noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621493109456933437.post-62918265309370847492010-07-23T07:04:55.340-07:002010-07-23T07:04:55.340-07:00

Not looking for a fight on this issue, but I&#39;ll just say I don&#39;t think it&#39;s fair to say comparing the devices is meaningless. Many folks are already deciding they don&#39;t need an iPad and are sticking with iPhones. My point was that giving the new iPhone nearly the same screen res as the iPad provides one more reason for iPhone users not to buy an iPad too. <br /><br />This was a

David Boardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06200260948279778582noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621493109456933437.post-47057839542653387272010-07-21T22:28:39.926-07:002010-07-21T22:28:39.926-07:00

The comparison is meaningless. It&#39;s not overkill if it works: try reading a pdf (of, say, a paper published in Nature) on the iPhone4 vs. a 3GS. The iPhone 4 is actually tolerably legible, without as much pinching and manipulation. (And the color display is better, too.)<br /><br />The iPad, being a larger device to begin with, doesn&#39;t require the same pixel density, though I&#39;ve no

ScottEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03132972790091524968noreply@blogger.com